|
Post by borovan on Apr 20, 2018 1:47:10 GMT -5
Written by: Borovan
Serial Number: HB; 04.2018.0001(continuing to 9999)
Protection from Unreasonable Banjections:
Protecting Nations from Unreasonable Ejections or Bans:
Definitions
1. Banjection – a ban and eject action caused by border control from a region officer, dislocating the resident to the rejected realms
Notations
1. Having studied that if a citizen is accused of a crime, they can be taken into court,
2. Deeply concerned if a resident of FNR is banjected without sufficient reasoning or direct communication with the nation,
3. Aware of the different lawbreaking behavior that can exist, ranging in from trivial (spam, trolling, ect.) to serious (treason, fraud, blackmail, ect.) ,
4. Bearing in mind the difference between known lawbreaking nations and accused nations, which the former is obvious and the latter is not clear, resulting in a judge which reviews the resulting evidence from both the defendant attorney and the prosecutor,
HERE BY
1. Declares accordingly that any resident before being banjected from FNR should be informed of their criminal actions, if their lawbreaking behavior is serious enough to be banjected, and that it is communicated in a timely manner;
2. Endorses a system in which the offending nation is warned about his or her behavior if his or her lawbreaking actions is less serious;
3. Calls upon that any punishment against a resident should be made according to the seriousness of the offending lawbreaking action.
4. Designates that nations used in spamming be excluded from this act.
|
|
|
Post by Crystalsummer on Apr 21, 2018 8:38:48 GMT -5
Motion to vote
|
|
|
Post by borovan on Apr 21, 2018 20:51:38 GMT -5
New draft I wrote, both aren't substantially different but I think either of them works.
Written by: Borovan
Serial Number: HB; 04.2018.0001(continuing to 9999)
Border Control Act:
Protecting Nations from Unreasonable Ejections or Bans:
Definitions
1. Banjection – a ban and eject action caused by border control from a region officer, dislocating the resident to the rejected realms
Notations
1. Deeply concerned about the safety of residents and citizens and the protocol of abuse of border control,
2. Aware of the different lawbreaking behavior that can exist, ranging in from trivial (spam, trolling, ect.) to serious (treason, fraud, blackmail, ect.) ,
3. Bearing in mind the difference between known lawbreaking nations and accused nations, which the former is obvious and the latter is not clear, resulting in a judge which reviews the resulting evidence from both the defendant attorney and the prosecutor,
HERE BY
1. Authorizes that residents of FNR are warned and communicated in a timely manner of any wrongdoing actions committed;
2. Designates that before an ejection or ban occurs, the nation must have committed malicious intent actions beyond a reasonable conscience to threaten harm to individual(s) or the community;
3. Affirms that if the nation seriously becomes a trouble, direct communication is encouraged between the offender and a civil mediator to try to remedy the individual.
4. Designates that nations used in spamming be excluded from this act.
|
|
|
Post by Zip on Apr 23, 2018 19:01:21 GMT -5
I feel that there should be an exception made specifically for spammers, mainly because of spammers who will continue to spam unless the mods get involved and if the mods get involved the person's nation will be deleted anyway... For all the other crimes, I think it should be fine not to eject/ban nations before a trial.
|
|
|
Post by borovan on Apr 23, 2018 22:22:37 GMT -5
Okay, gotcha. I added the clause. The nations used in spamming would not qualify the same as residents.
|
|